2026-11-05 06:32 UTC
Replies (10)
-
@waltersf@bookwyr.me 2026-11-05 06:40
For those wondering, this is not the win/lose you think it means. This is just one company showing they have the lobbying power to enforce their digressive victimhood on users. Copyright for you, not us
-
@Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-11-05 08:31
I can accept blatant copyright infringement, but blatant copyright infringement? That’s where we draw the line, pal
-
@sepiroth154@feddit.nl 2026-11-05 09:08
Claude please build me this completely original game with a blue hedgehog that collects rings.
-
@xep@discuss.online 2026-11-05 11:00
So use another model?
-
@quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-11-05 11:53
How good are those clones?
-
@Malica@lemmy.zip 2026-11-05 17:13
Oh look, they can respect copyright
-
@buzzsama@lemmy.zip 2026-11-05 17:22
You can steal content to train your models. But nobody else can utilize them in a manner which steals content. These types of decisions should bankrupt companies IMO.
-
@HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 2026-11-05 18:50
At the end of the day, the guys in charge - the guys who built the system to serve their interests - are still in charge, and keep a kill switch in their back pocket.
-
@Mordikan@kbin.earth 2026-11-05 23:19
I wonder if the Chinese models will give a damn about US copyright laws?
-
@beyond@linkage.ds8.zone 2026-11-06 00:54
Remember if it lives on “the cloud” (someone else’s computer) then they control it… not you. gnu.org/…/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html